cloro
Side-by-side

Oxylabs Alternatives: 5 Proxy & SERP APIs Tested (2026)

We tested 5 Oxylabs alternatives in 2026 — proxy scale, parsed SERPs with AI Overview, real per-1,000 pricing, and setup time. See which fits your workload.

4.8 · 42 reviewsG2.com software review platform logo

Why teams switch from Oxylabs

Issues users run into with Oxylabs

⚠️

~5% success rate on AI engines

Oxylabs is a general-purpose proxy scraper. When attempting to scrape ChatGPT, Perplexity, or Copilot, success rates drop to ~5% due to sophisticated anti-bot detection.

💰

Enterprise pricing tiers

SERP Scraper API starts at $49/month, but higher tiers and enterprise features require sales contact and custom pricing.

Not optimized for AI platforms

100M+ IPs built for traditional web scraping, not AI engines. AI platforms require specialized infrastructure that proxy networks can't match.

Quick comparison

How cloro compares to Oxylabs

cloro

RECOMMENDED
Starting price
$1.25–$2.00 per 1,000 (n=10 + AI Overview)
Setup time
5 minutes
Key advantage
99% success rate on AI engines vs ~5% for proxy scrapers

Oxylabs

Starting price
~$2 per 1,000 results (no AIO in default shape)
Setup time
10 minutes
Key advantage
Massive proxy network, no AI Overview parsing by default

Oxylabs is a proxy-first vendor. The core product is a 100M+ IP residential and datacenter network, and its SERP Scraper API is a parsing layer that rides on top of that infrastructure. That ordering matters: when you buy Oxylabs you’re buying proxies, and the SERP API is the convenience wrapper. It’s exactly right when your problem is proxy access — and more machinery than you need when all you want is parsed Google SERPs returned as clean JSON.

So the teams searching for Oxylabs alternatives in 2026 usually split into two camps. One wants the same proxy scale for less money or less friction — a straight infrastructure swap. The other never wanted to manage proxies and parsers at all: they want structured Google SERP data (organic, ads, AI Overview with citations, People Also Ask) as one managed response, and a proxy network is overhead they’d rather not carry.

Picking the right Oxylabs alternative comes down to which of those two problems you actually have. We tested five.

The 5 best Oxylabs alternatives at a glance

ToolModelEntry priceGoogle SERP rate (~1k)AI Overview
cloroParsed AI-native SERP API$100/mo (500 free credits)$1.25–$2.00 /1k (n=10 + AIO)✅ deep, default
Bright DataProxy + SERP layerPAYG; Business ~$999/mo~$1–$1.50 /1k (high end)⚠️ DIY / Web Unlocker
Decodo (ex-Smartproxy)Budget proxy + SERP APIfrom ~$0.32 /1k$0.32–$0.95 /1k❌ no AIO
ScraperAPICredit-based scraper$49/mo (1k free credits)25 credits/call ($12 /1k Google)❌ no AIO
ScrapingBeeHeadless-browser scraper$49/mo (150k credits)credit-multiplier dependent❌ no AIO

The five split on two axes that decide an Oxylabs replacement: whether you get parsed SERP JSON or raw access you parse yourself, and whether onboarding is self-serve or gated behind enterprise sales. Oxylabs sits at the proxy-first, parse-it-yourself-at-scale end of both. Each alternative below moves you toward one pole or the other.

What Oxylabs is actually built for

Oxylabs homepage

Oxylabs runs one of the largest proxy networks in the industry — 100M+ residential and datacenter IPs — and its SERP Scraper API is layered over that pool. The developer entry point is genuinely self-serve: the SERP Scraper API starts around $49/month at roughly $2 per 1,000 results (up to ~$2.80 per 1,000 at the entry/Micro tier), with JSON responses and country-level geo. But the reputation and most of the revenue live in the enterprise proxy business, and the higher tiers move toward contact-sales, custom IP mixes, and negotiated agreements. That’s the shape to keep in mind: an accessible SERP API bolted onto a proxy company built for scale and compliance.

Where the proxy network earns its keep

For the right workload, nothing on this list swaps in one-for-one:

  • Workloads that need a diverse proxy mix (residential, datacenter, mobile, ISP) routed through specific countries.
  • Compliance-bound teams that need documented proxy provenance and enterprise agreements.
  • High-volume, non-SERP scraping where the IP pool matters as much as the parsing.
  • Market-research and brand-protection crawls where proxy scale is the whole point.

If your problem is “we need residential bandwidth at scale through country-specific IPs,” Oxylabs is a category leader and you should keep it.

Where the proxy stack becomes overhead

For a team that only needs parsed Google SERPs, most of that infrastructure is cost you carry without using:

  • AI Overview is thin. The SERP Scraper API parses classic SERP fields, but AI Overview coverage is limited — citation lists and generative-block extraction aren’t a clean default field the way organic results are.
  • Tiers step toward sales. The $49 entry tier is self-serve, but scaling up or unlocking finer geo and features pulls you back toward contact-sales and custom pricing.
  • You still think in proxies. Results are billed as “successful results” over a proxy network, so you’re reasoning about IPs and success rates rather than one flat parsed-SERP call.

That’s the gap the alternatives below close — either by being a cheaper or friendlier proxy, or by removing the proxy-and-parser problem entirely.

The 5 real Oxylabs alternatives, tested

1. cloro — best for parsed, AI-native SERP data

cloro’s SERP API is the inverse of Oxylabs: there’s no proxy product to subscribe to and no parser to build. One endpoint family returns parsed JSON for Google Search and News, Google AI Overviews and AI Mode, plus ChatGPT, Perplexity, Copilot, Gemini, and Grok — with the actual cited source URLs each AI surface used. Where a proxy hands you HTML to parse, cloro returns organic results, ads, AI Overview (with citations), People Also Ask, and related searches in a single response.

That cross-surface coverage is the 2026 differentiator: tracking classic rank without tracking AI citations now misses half the SERP. cloro also fits existing pipelines through n8n, Zapier, LangChain, and MCP, with synchronous calls plus async/batch and webhook delivery for large query sets, and city-level geotargeting on every plan.

Pros: Deepest AI Overview parsing in this list, returned by default. One API across Google and every major AI surface. Self-serve signup with a free 500-credit trial. No proxy or parser to maintain. City-level geotargeting at the same per-call price on every plan.

Cons: Focused on search intelligence — it doesn’t sell a raw proxy pool or ship vertical Maps/Jobs/e-commerce scrapers the way Oxylabs does. Newer than the longest-running proxy vendors.

Pricing: Credit-based from $100/month (Hobby, 250,000 credits at $0.40 per 1,000 credits), scaling down to $0.31 per 1,000 on the largest self-serve tier and $0.25 on a custom Enterprise contract. A Google call is 3 credits at n=10, +2 with AI Overview — so n=10 + AIO works out to roughly $1.25–$2.00 per 1,000 calls. See the comparison card above, and the pricing page for full tiers.

2. Bright Data — closest like-for-like proxy + SERP infrastructure

If what you want is the same proxy-first shape as Oxylabs from a different vendor, Bright Data is the nearest match: a 72M+ IP residential network across 195+ countries with a dedicated SERP API riding on top. Like Oxylabs, the proxy stack is the real product and the SERP API is the wrapper — and like Oxylabs, the enterprise posture shows up in onboarding (KYC review, an MSA, and a sales conversation before committed pricing kicks in).

Pros: Proxy scale and country coverage in the same league as Oxylabs. Dedicated SERP API on top. Rigorous compliance and provenance for regulated buyers.

Cons: Enterprise sales motion — KYC and an MSA gate the better rates. AI Overview isn’t a clean parsed field; you extract it yourself via Web Unlocker. Business plans land near $999/month.

Pricing: Pay-as-you-go, with the SERP API around $1–$1.50 per 1,000 at the high-volume end; the Business tier lands near $999/month.

3. Decodo (formerly Smartproxy) — cheapest self-serve SERP scraping

Decodo is the budget answer, and the closer spiritual match to Oxylabs’s self-serve tier. It’s a self-serve proxy network with its own SERP Scraping API, and on raw per-request price it undercuts everyone here: the Core tier starts around $0.32 per 1,000 requests, with higher tiers landing near $0.88–$0.95 per 1,000. If your only goal is “the cheapest way to pull Google results at volume” and you’re comfortable parsing them yourself, Decodo is hard to beat on headline rate. (Decodo has no dedicated comparison page on cloro — it’s included here on the merits.)

Pros: Lowest per-request SERP price in this comparison. Self-serve with a 7-day free trial. Genuinely easy to start.

Cons: No structured AI Overview parsing — you handle SERP-element extraction yourself. Smaller ecosystem and documentation than Oxylabs or Bright Data.

Pricing: SERP Scraping API from ~$0.32 per 1,000 (Core) up to ~$0.95 per 1,000 on higher tiers; 7-day free trial (Decodo pricing).

4. ScraperAPI — developer-friendly proxy with structured endpoints

ScraperAPI is closer to a developer product than an enterprise proxy: one API key, proxy rotation and retries handled for you, and structured JSON endpoints for popular targets including Google Search. It’s a strong Oxylabs alternative for teams that want proxy-backed scraping without the enterprise procurement overhead.

The catch is the credit model. Plans are denominated in credits, and difficult targets cost more — Google’s structured-data endpoints bill at 25 credits per request. On the $49/month Hobby plan (100,000 credits) that’s about 4,000 Google SERP calls, an effective rate near $12 per 1,000 for Google specifically. There’s no structured AI Overview field.

Pros: Self-serve, developer-first, with a free 1,000-credit tier and a 7-day trial. Structured Google endpoints (organic, ads, PAA, related) out of the box.

Cons: Credit weighting makes Google SERP calls expensive relative to a flat per-call SERP API. No AI Overview parsing. Costs vary by target difficulty.

Pricing: Hobby $49/month (100,000 credits; Google = 25 credits/call). Free 1,000 credits plus a 7-day trial (ScraperAPI pricing).

5. ScrapingBee — headless-browser scraping for JS-heavy targets

ScrapingBee approaches the problem from the browser side: a headless-browser scraping API that renders JavaScript, rotates proxies, and returns the page. It’s a fit when you’re scraping rendered content across many site types, not just SERPs — but that generality is also the trade, because Google SERP work leans on the credit multipliers.

Plans run from $49/month (Discovery, 150,000 credits) up to Enterprise at $599/month (8M credits), and credits burn faster with rendering options: JavaScript rendering ×5, premium proxy ×25, and stealth proxy up to ×75. There’s a free 1,000-credit trial, and no structured AI Overview field.

Pros: Handles JS-heavy pages and general web scraping well. Self-serve with a free 1,000-credit trial. Broad beyond just Google SERPs.

Cons: Credit multipliers (JS ×5, premium proxy ×25, stealth up to ×75) make hard Google SERP pulls expensive. No AI Overview parsing. Not a purpose-built SERP API.

Pricing: Discovery $49/month (150,000 credits) up to Enterprise $599/month (8M credits); free 1,000-credit trial; credit multipliers apply (ScrapingBee pricing).

Oxylabs alternatives: price and parsing compared

Headline proxy rates mislead, because the number that matters is total delivered cost — the per-1,000 rate plus the engineering you spend turning raw access into parsed SERP rows. A $0.32/1,000 proxy that needs a parser you build and maintain is not cheaper than a $2/1,000 API that returns structured JSON if that parser costs you weeks.

VendorModelGoogle SERP rate (~1k)You parse?AI Overview
cloroParsed SERP API$1.25–$2.00 (n=10 + AIO)No✅ default
OxylabsProxy + SERP Scraper API~$2.00–$2.80 /1k resultsNo⚠️ limited
Bright DataProxy + SERP layer~$1–$1.50 (high end)Mostly⚠️ DIY / Web Unlocker
DecodoBudget proxy + SERP API$0.32–$0.95Yes
ScraperAPICredit scraper~$12 /1k Google (25 cr/call)Partial
ScrapingBeeHeadless-browser scrapermultiplier-dependentPartial

Headline takeaways:

  • Cheapest raw rate: Decodo ($0.32–$0.95/1k) — but you parse the SERP yourself and get no AI Overview field.
  • Closest infrastructure swap for Oxylabs: Bright Data — comparable proxy scale and a SERP layer, though with a heavier enterprise sales motion.
  • Lowest total delivered cost for parsed Google + AI Overview: cloro, because the AI Overview parser, citation extraction, and PAA hydration are already done — nothing to build or maintain.
  • Most expensive for Google specifically: ScraperAPI, where the 25-credit weighting pushes the effective Google rate near $12/1k; ScrapingBee’s multipliers land in the same territory on hard pulls.

For the price-only view see Cheapest SERP API 2026; for the full managed-API roundup see Best SERP APIs in 2026.

Migration playbook: Oxylabs → cloro

If you’re moving off Oxylabs specifically to stop maintaining proxies and parsers, the switch is small:

  1. Proxy + your parser → one parsed endpoint. Delete the AI Overview detection, PAA hydration, and ad-sitelink parsing you built on top of Oxylabs’s SERP results. cloro returns those as structured fields.
  2. “Successful results” billing → per-call credits. Stop reasoning about proxy success rates and result quotas — one credit rate per call, sync by default.
  3. Country-level geo → city-level on every plan. cloro accepts Google’s canonical geotargets down to city level at the same per-call price, with no upgrade path to unlock it.
  4. Add AI-surface coverage for free. The same integration that reads Google also reads AI Overview, AI Mode, ChatGPT, Perplexity, Copilot, Gemini, and Grok, so AI-citation tracking is one API, not a second vendor.

What you can’t migrate to cloro: a raw residential/datacenter proxy pool, or scraping of arbitrary non-SERP sites. If that’s your real requirement, keep Oxylabs or move to Bright Data/Decodo — cloro is a SERP API, not a proxy.

Decision tree: which Oxylabs alternative to pick

  • Need a raw proxy pool at Oxylabs-class scale, just from a different vendor? Bright Data for enterprise infrastructure, or Decodo for the budget, self-serve tier.
  • Cheapest possible per-request rate and you’ll parse the HTML yourself? Decodo.
  • Want proxy-backed scraping with a developer-first API and structured Google endpoints? ScraperAPI.
  • Scraping JS-heavy pages across many site types, not just SERPs? ScrapingBee.
  • Never wanted to manage proxies or parsers — you just need parsed Google SERPs with AI Overview, plus ChatGPT/Perplexity/Gemini citations through one API? cloro.

The bottom line

Oxylabs is a proxy infrastructure company with a SERP Scraper API on the side, and the best Oxylabs alternative depends on which half of that you actually need. If you need the proxies, Bright Data and Decodo are the like-for-like swaps — one at enterprise scale, one at budget. If you want proxy-backed scraping with a friendlier developer experience, ScraperAPI or ScrapingBee fit.

But if the reason you’re leaving is that you never wanted to run proxies and maintain SERP parsers in the first place, the answer isn’t another proxy — it’s a parsed SERP API. cloro returns organic results, ads, AI Overview with citations, and People Also Ask in one self-serve call, across Google and every major AI surface, with a free 500-credit trial to baseline your own keywords before you commit.

Feature comparison

How the two stack up, feature by feature

FeaturecloroOxylabs
AI Platform SupportNative ChatGPT, Perplexity, Copilot scrapingSERP scraper only (no AI platforms)
Setup Time5 minutes self-serviceSelf-service for base tier
Proxy Network SizeOptimized for AI engines100M+ IPs across 195+ countries
API DesignModern REST with 99% success ratesEnterprise APIs, simple for base tier
Geolocation SupportComprehensive coverage for all major markets195+ countries with full proxy network
AI Overview ScrapingNative Google AI Overview with citationsBasic SERP scraping only
Pricing ModelCredit-based, transparent pricingTiered pricing, sales required for enterprise
Developer ExperienceInstant API key, comprehensive docsSelf-service base tier, sales for enterprise

The verdict

If you need enterprise-grade proxy infrastructure with 100M+ IPs across 195 countries, Oxylabs is unmatched. Their SERP Scraper API starts at an accessible $49/month. But for 95% of teams doing AI scraping and monitoring, cloro offers better tools, faster setup, AI platform coverage, and fairer pricing – without the enterprise complexity.

Switch from Oxylabs to cloro

Frequently asked questions

Which Oxylabs product does cloro compare to?+

The developer-tier SERP Scraper API, which starts at $49/month with self-serve signup and JSON responses. Oxylabs's other product is enterprise proxy infrastructure — Web Unblocker, 100M+ residential IPs, custom contracts — which solves a different problem. cloro doesn't sell proxies, so the developer SERP tier is the realistic comparison surface.

Can Oxylabs scrape ChatGPT, Perplexity, or Copilot?+

Oxylabs is a general-purpose proxy scraper built for traditional web scraping, and success rates drop to roughly 5% on AI engines because of their anti-bot detection. cloro runs purpose-built infrastructure for those platforms with a 99% success rate, plus native ChatGPT, Perplexity, and Copilot coverage.

Does the Oxylabs developer tier return AI Overview?+

No. AI Overview citations and hydrated People Also Ask aren't part of the developer tier's default response shape. cloro's SERP API returns the AI Overview block — text, markdown, sources, and embedded sponsored ads — and PAA out of the box.

How does geo-targeting compare?+

Oxylabs supports country-level targeting on the developer tier and adds finer geo on higher tiers. cloro accepts any of Google's roughly 100,000 canonical geotargets, including city-level, at the same per-call price on every plan — there's no upgrade path to unlock it.

Is Oxylabs's pricing directly comparable to cloro's?+

Not exactly — the units differ. Oxylabs counts successful results at roughly $2 per 1,000 (from $49/month) without AI Overview or hydrated PAA; cloro counts API calls at $1.25–$2.00 per 1,000 (n=10) with all three included. The per-1k figures aren't directly substitutable, so pick by what shape your pipeline expects.

Each page maps cloro's SERP API against one alternative on pricing, AI Overview coverage, and developer experience. Compare Oxylabs with the rest of the field:

Apify homepage

Apify Alternative: 5 Scraping & SERP APIs Tested (2026)

We tested 5 Apify alternatives in 2026 — managed SERP APIs vs actor marketplaces, AI Overview, and real pricing. See which fits without maintaining actors.

Read comparison
Bright Data homepage

Bright Data Alternative: 5 SERP APIs Tested (2026)

We tested 5 Bright Data alternatives in 2026 — parsed Google SERPs, AI Overview, real per-1,000 pricing, and setup time. See which proxy or SERP API fits.

Read comparison
DataForSEO homepage

DataForSEO Alternative: 5 SERP APIs Tested (2026)

We tested 5 DataForSEO alternatives in 2026 — AI Overview support, real per-call pricing, and developer experience. See which SEO data API fits.

Read comparison
ScrapeDO homepage

ScrapeDO Alternatives: 5 SERP & Scraping APIs Tested (2026)

We tested 5 Scrape.do alternatives in 2026 — parsed SERPs with AI Overview vs cheap raw HTML, reliability, and real per-1,000 pricing. See which fits.

Read comparison
ScraperAPI homepage

ScraperAPI Alternatives: 5 Scraping & SERP APIs Tested (2026)

We tested 5 ScraperAPI alternatives in 2026 — parsed SERPs, AI Overview, real credit-vs-per-call pricing, and success rates. See which scraping API fits.

Read comparison
ScrapingBee homepage

ScrapingBee Alternatives: 5 Scraping & SERP APIs Tested (2026)

We tested 5 ScrapingBee alternatives in 2026 — JS rendering vs parsed SERPs, AI Overview, and real credit-vs-per-call pricing. See which scraper fits.

Read comparison
SearchApi homepage

SearchApi Alternatives: 5 SERP APIs Tested (2026)

We tested 5 SearchApi alternatives in 2026 — Google feature depth, AI Overview parsing, engine breadth, and real per-call pricing. See which SERP API fits.

Read comparison
SerpAPI homepage

SerpApi Alternative: 5 SERP APIs Tested (2026)

We tested 5 SerpApi alternatives in 2026 — AI Overview support, real per-call pricing, and engine coverage. See which SERP API fits your workload best.

Read comparison
Serper homepage

Serper Alternative: 5 SERP APIs Tested (2026)

We tested 5 Serper alternatives in 2026 — AI Overview parsing, structured SERP depth, and real per-call pricing beyond fast-and-cheap. See which SERP API fits.

Read comparison