ScrapeDO Alternatives: 5 SERP & Scraping APIs Tested (2026)

Scrape.do — often typed as one word, ScrapeDO — sits at the cheap end of the SERP-scraping market. Its pitch is a rendered page at the lowest published CPM in the category ($0.70–$1.16 per 1,000 requests), and everything downstream — parsing, pagination, AI Overview reconstruction, retry logic — is on you. That structure is exactly right when raw HTML is all you need. It’s overhead when you actually want a parsed Google response.

So if you’re shopping for a Scrape.do alternative (or a ScrapeDO alternative — same question, different spelling), the real fork is whether you need cheap raw bytes or structured SERP JSON. Most teams searching for ScrapeDO alternatives in 2026 fall into two camps: they want an even cheaper raw scraper, or they never wanted to build and babysit a SERP parser at all — they want organic results, ads, People Also Ask, and AI Overview returned as clean JSON.

The right pick depends on which camp you’re in. We tested five.

The 5 best Scrape.do alternatives at a glance

Tool	Model	Entry price	Google SERP rate (~1k)	AI Overview
cloro	Parsed AI-native SERP API	$100/mo (500 free credits)	$1.25–$2.00 /1k (n=10 + AIO)	✅ deep, default
Scrape.do	Raw-HTML SERP scraper	$29/mo	$0.70–$1.16 /1k (raw HTML)	❌ not rendered
ScraperAPI	Credit-based scraper	$49/mo (1k free credits)	25 credits/call ($12 /1k Google)	❌ no AIO
ScrapingBee	Headless-browser scraper	$49/mo (1k free credits)	credit-multiplier dependent	❌ no AIO
Bright Data	Proxy + SERP layer	PAYG; Business ~$999/mo	~$1–$1.50 /1k (Google, high end)	⚠️ not a clean field
Decodo (ex-Smartproxy)	Budget proxy + SERP API	from ~$0.32 /1k	$0.32–$0.95 /1k	❌ no AIO

The alternatives split on two axes that matter for a Scrape.do replacement: whether you get parsed SERP JSON or raw access you parse yourself, and whether the AI Overview block comes back as a structured field or not at all. Scrape.do sits at the raw-HTML, no-AIO end of both. Every alternative below moves you along one axis or the other.

What Scrape.do is actually built for

Scrape.do is a lean, developer-first scraping proxy. You hand it a URL, it renders the page and hands back the HTML — with proxy rotation, retries, and headless rendering handled behind the endpoint. Onboarding is fully self-serve: plans start at $29/month ($1.16 per 1,000) and scale to $699/month ($0.70 per 1,000) (Scrape.do pricing), the cheapest CPM among SERP-adjacent products in the April 2026 competitive analysis. There’s no sales motion, no KYC, and no minimum commitment — which is a real part of the appeal.

Where the cheapest raw-HTML CPM earns its keep

For the right workload, Scrape.do’s rate is genuinely hard to beat:

• Raw-HTML capture for archival, diffing, or non-SERP page analysis.
• Low-stakes lookups where an occasional failed request is tolerable.
• Pipelines where the team already maintains a SERP parser and isn’t tracking AI Overview.
• Cost-sensitive scrapes against a fixed page layout that doesn’t churn.

If your problem is “we need cheap rendered HTML at volume and we’ll extract what we need ourselves,” Scrape.do is a strong, honest tool and you should keep it.

Where raw HTML becomes overhead

For a team that only needs parsed Google SERPs, the cheap CPM hides three costs:

• You bring the parser. Scrape.do returns the rendered page — there is no parsed organic[], ads[], peopleAlsoAsk[], or aioverview field. Extracting positions, sponsored sitelinks, PAA expansions, and AI-generated content into structured rows is your code, and it re-breaks every time Google ships a SERP layout change.
• AI Overview usually isn’t in the box. Per the April 2026 analysis, Scrape.do’s returned HTML often doesn’t contain the AI Overview surface at all — so even a perfect parser has nothing to parse. AI-Overview-aware monitoring is a non-starter on the default surface.
• Reliability lags parsed-SERP APIs. The same benchmark flagged Scrape.do’s success rate as trailing the parsed alternatives, and geo targeting is country-level only. The failed-call retry overhead eats into the CPM advantage, so the cheapest published rate is not the cheapest delivered rate.

That’s the gap the alternatives below close — either by being a similarly cheap raw scraper, or by removing the parser-and-retry problem entirely.

The 5 real Scrape.do alternatives, tested

1. cloro — best for parsed, AI-native SERP data

cloro’s SERP API is the inverse of Scrape.do: there’s no raw HTML to parse and no parser to maintain. One endpoint family returns parsed JSON for Google Search and News, Google AI Overviews and AI Mode, plus ChatGPT, Perplexity, Copilot, Gemini, and Grok — with the actual cited source URLs each AI surface used. Where a raw scraper hands you a page, cloro returns organic results, ads, AI Overview (with citations), People Also Ask, and related searches in a single response.

That cross-surface coverage is the 2026 differentiator: tracking classic rank without tracking AI citations now misses half the SERP. cloro also fits existing pipelines through n8n, Zapier, LangChain, and MCP, with synchronous calls plus async/batch and webhook delivery for large query sets, and city-level geo targeting rather than Scrape.do’s country-level.

Pros: Deepest AI Overview parsing in this list, returned by default. One API across Google and every major AI surface. Self-serve signup with a free 500-credit trial. No parser and no retry budget to maintain — Google’s layout changes don’t surface as outages on your end.

Cons: Focused on search intelligence — it doesn’t sell a raw scraper for arbitrary non-SERP pages the way Scrape.do does. Newer than the longest-running scrapers.

Pricing: Credit-based from $100/month (Hobby, 250,000 credits at $0.40 per 1,000 credits), scaling down to $0.31 per 1,000 on the largest self-serve tier and $0.25 on a custom Enterprise contract. A Google call is 3 credits at n=10, +2 with AI Overview — so n=10 + AIO is $1.25–$2.00 per 1,000 and n=100 + AIO is $5.75–$9.20 per 1,000. See the pricing page for full tiers.

2. ScraperAPI — developer-friendly scraper with structured endpoints

ScraperAPI is closer to Scrape.do in shape than the rest of this list: one API key, proxy rotation and retries handled for you, and structured JSON endpoints for popular targets including Google Search. It’s a natural step up for teams that want proxy-backed scraping with a bit more structure than raw HTML, without leaving the self-serve tier.

The catch is the credit model. Plans are denominated in credits, and difficult targets cost more — Google’s structured-data endpoints bill at 25 credits per request. On the $49/month Hobby plan (100,000 credits) that’s about 4,000 Google SERP calls, an effective rate near $12 per 1,000 for Google specifically. There’s no structured AI Overview field.

Pros: Self-serve, developer-first, with a free 1,000-credit tier and a 7-day trial. Structured Google endpoints (organic, ads, PAA, related) out of the box — more than Scrape.do’s raw HTML.

Cons: Credit weighting makes Google SERP calls expensive relative to a flat per-call SERP API. No AI Overview parsing. Costs swing with target difficulty.

Pricing: Hobby $49/month (100,000 credits; Google = 25 credits/call). Free 1,000 credits plus a 7-day trial.

3. ScrapingBee — headless-browser scraping with JS rendering

ScrapingBee leans on headless-browser rendering, which makes it a good fit for JavaScript-heavy targets where Scrape.do’s cheaper raw fetch struggles. Like ScraperAPI it’s a credit product, but the credit cost is driven by multipliers rather than a flat per-target rate: JavaScript rendering is ×5, premium (residential) proxies ×25, and stealth mode up to ×75. That makes the effective Google SERP cost highly dependent on which features you switch on.

Pros: Strong JS rendering for dynamic pages. Self-serve with a free 1,000-credit tier. Clean API and good docs.

Cons: The credit multipliers make hard targets — the ones that need premium proxies or stealth — expensive fast. No structured AI Overview parsing. You still extract SERP elements yourself.

Pricing: Discovery $49/month (150,000 credits) up to Enterprise $599/month (8M credits); effective Google cost depends on the JS/premium/stealth multipliers you enable.

4. Bright Data — proxy-first infrastructure with a SERP layer

Bright Data is the enterprise-scale option: 72M+ residential IPs across 195+ countries with a dedicated SERP API layered on top. If your requirement is really about proxy scale and country coverage — not just cheap Google HTML — it’s a category leader. But onboarding is a sales motion (company details, KYC, volume discussion), the Business tier lands near $999/month, and AI Overview doesn’t come back as a clean parsed field. Its SERP API runs roughly $1–$1.50 per 1,000 at the high-volume end.

Pros: Unmatched proxy scale and geo coverage. Enterprise compliance posture. SERP API rate is competitive at volume.

Cons: Enterprise sales-led onboarding measured in days, not minutes. Enterprise minimums unfriendly to small teams. No clean AI Overview field — you still parse the surface yourself.

Pricing: Pay-as-you-go with committed plans; Business tier near $999/month, SERP API ~$1–$1.50 per 1,000 at higher volume.

5. Decodo (formerly Smartproxy) — cheapest self-serve, closest to Scrape.do on price

Decodo (renamed from Smartproxy) is the budget answer and the closest match to Scrape.do’s price positioning. It’s a self-serve proxy network with its own SERP Scraping API, and on raw per-request price it competes directly: the Core tier starts around $0.32 per 1,000 requests, with higher tiers landing near $0.88–$0.95 per 1,000. If your only goal is “the cheapest way to pull Google results at volume” and you’re comfortable parsing them yourself, Decodo is the like-for-like swap. (Decodo has no dedicated comparison page here — it’s included on price parity alone.)

Pros: Rock-bottom per-request SERP price, in the same band as Scrape.do. Self-serve with a 7-day free trial. Genuinely easy to start.

Cons: No structured AI Overview parsing — you handle SERP-element extraction, same as Scrape.do. Smaller ecosystem and documentation than the larger vendors.

Pricing: SERP Scraping API from ~$0.32 per 1,000 (Core) up to ~$0.95 per 1,000 on higher tiers; 7-day free trial.

Scrape.do alternatives: price and parsing compared

Headline CPMs mislead, because the number that matters is total delivered cost — the per-1,000 rate plus the engineering you spend turning raw access into parsed SERP rows, plus the retry budget a lower success rate forces. A $0.70/1,000 raw scraper that needs a parser you build and maintain is not cheaper than a $2/1,000 API that returns structured JSON if that parser costs you weeks.

Vendor	Model	Google SERP rate (~1k)	You parse?	AI Overview
cloro	Parsed SERP API	$1.25–$2.00 (n=10 + AIO)	No	✅ default
Scrape.do	Raw-HTML scraper	$0.70–$1.16	Yes	❌ not rendered
ScraperAPI	Credit scraper	~$12 /1k Google (25 cr/call)	Partial	❌
ScrapingBee	Headless-browser scraper	multiplier-dependent	Partial	❌
Bright Data	Proxy + SERP layer	~$1–$1.50 (Google, high end)	Mostly	⚠️ not a clean field
Decodo	Budget proxy + SERP API	$0.32–$0.95	Yes	❌

Headline takeaways:

• Cheapest raw rate: Decodo ($0.32–$0.95/1k) edges Scrape.do — but both hand you unparsed results with no AI Overview field.
• Lowest total delivered cost for parsed Google + AI Overview: cloro, because the AI Overview parser, citation extraction, and PAA hydration are already done — nothing to build or maintain.
• Most expensive for Google specifically: ScraperAPI, where the 25-credit weighting pushes the effective Google rate near $12/1k; ScrapingBee is unpredictable once premium/stealth multipliers stack.
• Only clean AI Overview field in the table: cloro — every other option leaves it to you, or doesn’t return the surface at all.

For the price-only view see Cheapest SERP API 2026; for the full managed-API roundup see Best SERP APIs in 2026.

Decision tree: which Scrape.do alternative to pick

• Cheapest possible per-request rate and you’ll parse the HTML yourself? Decodo, or stay on Scrape.do — they’re the budget, raw-output tier.
• Want proxy-backed scraping with a developer-first API and structured Google endpoints? ScraperAPI.
• Scraping JavaScript-heavy targets that need real headless rendering? ScrapingBee.
• Need enterprise proxy scale and country coverage, not just cheap Google HTML? Bright Data.
• Never wanted to maintain a SERP parser — you just need parsed Google SERPs with AI Overview, plus ChatGPT/Perplexity/Gemini citations through one API? cloro.

The bottom line

Scrape.do sells the cheapest raw-HTML CPM in the SERP-adjacent market, and the best ScrapeDO alternative depends on which half of the trade you actually care about. If you want an even cheaper or comparably cheap raw scraper and you’ll parse the results yourself, Decodo is the like-for-like swap; ScraperAPI and ScrapingBee add structure and rendering at a higher effective rate; Bright Data adds enterprise proxy scale.

But if the reason you’re leaving is that you never wanted to build and babysit a SERP parser — or you need AI Overview at all, which Scrape.do simply doesn’t render — the answer isn’t another raw scraper. It’s a parsed SERP API. cloro returns organic results, ads, AI Overview with citations, and People Also Ask in one self-serve call, across Google and every major AI surface, with a free 500-credit trial to baseline your own keywords before you commit.